
When Should Your Child Start Nursery? đź‘¶ Optimal Starting Age âś“ NICHD Study Explained âś“ Step-by-Step Settling-In âś“ Guide

Entdecken Sie Little Star Day School
‍
The question "When should my child start nursery?" is far more than a logistical entry in young parents' calendars. It's one of the most emotionally charged and complex decisions mothers and fathers must make during their child's early years. It touches upon parents' own sense of identity, frequently sits at the intersection of competing life choices, and is often debated publicly in controversial and ideologically charged terms. Whilst early non-parental childcare is accepted societal norm in Scandinavia or France, the German-speaking world—and to some extent Switzerland—still harbours a lingering scepticism towards early external care.
Yet emotions and traditions make poor advisors when it comes to a child's neurological and psychological development. This report aims to bring objectivity to the debate. We're leaving behind the realm of opinions and entering the territory of evidence-based science. Drawing on current findings from developmental psychology, neuroscience, and attachment research, we analyse which factors truly determine whether and when external childcare benefits a child.
One thing quickly becomes clear: the question isn't solely "When?" but, more importantly, "Where?" The quality of the setting is the decisive variable that determines whether a nursery represents stress or stimulation, risk or resilience factor. This guide serves as a navigation tool for parents who want to understand what happens in their child's brain when they're integrated into a group setting, how to recognise genuine pedagogical quality, and how to determine the optimal starting point for their individual child.
To understand when a child is ready for nursery, we must first understand what's happening in their head during the early years. The period from birth to the third year of life is often referred to as "the first 1000 days" and represents the most critical window of neurological development.
At birth, the human brain possesses billions of neurones, yet these are barely interconnected. During the first three years of life, the number of synapses—the connections between nerve cells—explodes. This process, synaptogenesis, is largely driven by experience. "Use it or lose it" is the guiding principle: connections that are utilised strengthen; those unused atrophy (pruning).
During this phase, the brain is extraordinarily plastic and receptive, but also vulnerable. It requires two things in balance:
Settings that work according to modern curricula, such as the Early Years Curriculum (EYC®) at Little Star Day School, are founded precisely on this understanding. They see themselves not merely as childcare, but as learning and developmental environments where children receive targeted, age-appropriate support—whether through bilingual input, purposeful sensory activities, or social interaction spaces.
For a long time, attachment theory according to John Bowlby was interpreted to mean that separation from the mother during the early years was inherently harmful. Modern research paints a more nuanced picture. Attachment is not an exclusive bond to a single person, but rather a hierarchical system.
The NICHD study (National Institute of Child Health and Human Development), one of the world's largest longitudinal studies on childcare, has demonstrated that it's not the fact of external care that determines attachment security, but rather the sensitivity of caregivers—both parents at home and educators at nursery.
‍
Table: Factors Influencing Attachment Security According to NICHD
‍
The conclusion: A child comes to no harm when they allow an additional attachment figure (their key person) into their life. On the contrary: a rich network of trusting relationships strengthens resilience. The prerequisite, however, is that the nursery enables these relationships—through consistent key persons rather than constantly changing staff.
The question "When should my child start nursery?" cannot be answered universally, as the developmental needs of a 6-month-old infant are fundamentally different from those of a 2-year-old. We analyse the advantages and disadvantages for the various age stages.
Starting nursery during the first year of life feels particularly sensitive for many parents. The bond is still very close, daily routines are highly synchronised, and the thought of an early separation often triggers mixed feelings and questions.
When quality is right, early care can offer advantages. Settings like Little Star employ specialised concepts such as the "Nappy Curriculum" and "Bottle Bridge".
The Nappy Curriculum© is an educational concept for babies in their first year of life. It deliberately places care situations—such as nappy changing, feeding, and soothing—at the heart of daily life. Rather than treating these as mere routine, these moments are purposefully used to build relationships and promote development: in 1:1 situations, babies experience intensive eye contact, sensitive communication ("I'm lifting your legs now"), and reliable, individualised attention. At the same time, the Nappy Curriculum© ensures that nutrition and daily routines remain as individualised as possible until the first birthday.
Programmes such as "Bottle Bridge" support breastfeeding parents in maintaining breastfeeding or making a well-supported transition to bottle feeding. The aim is for the baby to feel securely and reliably nourished at nursery—regardless of whether they're breastfed, bottle-fed, or gradually introduced to complementary foods.
A nursery start in the first year of life is possible when the staff-to-child ratio is very high (ideally 1:2 or 1:3) and the setting has specialised baby rooms that are spatially separated from the noisier toddler groups—and when there's a clear concept for attachment, care, and nutrition such as the Nappy Curriculum©.
Between the first and second birthday, the autonomy phase begins. Children become mobile and start actively exploring the world.
From three years of age, the child transforms from "nestling" to "world explorer".
Scientific Consensus:
From this age, almost all experts recommend attending a setting.
‍
Table: Developmental Needs and Nursery Requirements by Age
A common argument against early nursery attendance is studies demonstrating elevated cortisol levels (stress hormone) in nursery children. Critics such as Dr Rainer Böhm or interpretations of the Vienna nursery study are frequently cited. Yet a careful analysis of the data shows: stress is not simply stress.
The meta-analysis by Vermeer and van IJzendoorn confirmed that whilst cortisol levels in nurseries often don't decline as sharply in the afternoon as they do at home (or even rise slightly), it also identified the crucial moderators:
The child's brain distinguishes between:
To prevent toxic stress, a practitioner must be immediately available when a child cries. With a ratio of 1:12 (as is sometimes the case in Germany or in state-run settings), this is realistically barely achievable. A favourable staff ratio—for instance, one practitioner for three babies rather than six or eight—enables swift co-regulation: the child repeatedly experiences "When I'm stressed, someone is there." This experience stabilises the stress system and prevents persistently elevated cortisol levels.
An often underestimated stressor is noise. Noise levels exceeding 80 dB (comparable to a busy main road) are not uncommon in less favourable nurseries.
Solution Through Design and Approach: Good nurseries work with sound insulation, clearly structured spaces, and fixed quiet periods to reduce the acoustic environment. At Little Star, this is evident in separate areas for different age groups—such as baby sleep rooms and quiet corners or discovery zones—as well as in regular use of outdoor spaces like the garden, forest, or city walks. This relieves group dynamics and can significantly reduce the perceived noise for children.
A significant argument for nursery attendance—and indeed an early start—is utilising sensitive periods for learning that often cannot be replicated at home. Bilingualism is particularly noteworthy here.
During the first three to five years of life, the brain is a "language genius". It doesn't store languages through laborious vocabulary learning (declarative memory), but absorbs them implicitly (procedural memory).
Broca's Area: Studies show that with early bilingualism, both languages are processed in the same region of Broca's area. With late learning (e.g. at school), the languages use separate areas, which is cognitively more demanding.
Critical Period: The ability to distinguish and reproduce phonemes without an accent begins to decline gradually from 12 months of age and closes almost completely by the end of puberty.
The most effective method is immersion (a "language bath"). Little Star applies the "One Person – One Language" principle.
The child doesn't need to "learn"; they live in both languages. They sing, eat, play, and find comfort in both languages.
The research is unequivocal: the earlier, the better. Starting at 6 months or 1 year harnesses the full potential of neuroplasticity. Starting at 3 or 4 years is still very good, but often requires somewhat more conscious effort from the child than the intuitive absorption during infancy. So if effortless bilingualism is valued, this provides a strong argument for an early nursery start in a bilingual setting.
How can parents tell whether a nursery meets high quality standards? The following criteria help with assessment.
A nursery shouldn't simply "get on with it", but should work according to a clear pedagogical approach.
Important points:
A useful question from parents is: "How do you document my child's development?"
Parents can ask specifically: "How are meals planned and prepared?"
A good nursery sees itself as a partner to families.
Regardless of whether the child is 6 months or 3 years old: the transition from family to nursery is a psychological feat for all involved. If settling-in fails, attachment trauma and negative stress are risks.
The gold standard, which Little Star also employs, is the Berlin Settling-in Model. It is attachment-focused and child-centred.
One parent (ideally the primary caregiver) comes with the child to nursery for approximately 1-2 hours.
The parent says goodbye briefly (!) and leaves the room for a maximum of 30 minutes, but remains in the building.
Separation times are gradually increased. Only when the child accepts the key person as a "secure base" (i.e. allows themselves to be comforted by them) is settling-in complete.
Often it's the parents who suffer more than the children. Children have fine antennae. If the mother is uncertain at goodbye, anxious, or feeling guilty ("bad mother"), the child senses: "It's not safe here, otherwise Mummy wouldn't look at me so worried."
Tip: Address your ambivalences before nursery starts. Trust the setting. A brief, cheerful goodbye ritual signals security.
The question "When should my child start nursery?" cannot be answered in a single sentence, but based on the research, we can outline broad parameters:
Settings such as Little Star Day School demonstrate how modern nursery care that complements family life can be designed: not as a replacement for the family, but as an enhancement. Children gain an additional space for experience where they can explore, hear languages, and form friendships—embedded within a network of professional pedagogy and parental closeness.
Ultimately, it remains a personal decision. With knowledge of neuroplasticity, attachment security, and clear quality criteria, however, this decision can be guided less by fear and more by informed conviction.
Andere Blog-Artikel