
English Kindergarten in Switzerland 🌍 Concepts Compared: Purely English, Bilingual or Multilingual? ✓ Find Out More!

Entdecken Sie Little Star Day School
You've made up your mind: your child should grow up with the English language – or at least have the chance to do so. So you search online. And you land on terms that all sound alike yet don't mean the same thing: English kindergarten, bilingual kindergarten, international kindergarten, English nursery, bilingual early years education. Are they all the same?
No. And that is precisely the problem – and the starting point of this article.
One reason for this confusion of terms lies in German and Swiss usage itself. In many countries, "Kindergarten" refers quite generally to early childhood care before school begins – in other words, what in Switzerland is called "Kita" or "Krippe" (nursery or crèche). In Switzerland, by contrast, the kindergarten is already part of compulsory state schooling: it begins at around the age of four, usually lasts two years and is just as compulsory as the primary school that follows. Because many parents – and search engines – use the term in its broader, everyday sense, this article too uses "kindergarten" as an umbrella term for the whole range of provision before the move into Year 1. Where the distinction matters, we distinguish precisely in what follows between the nursery stage (Kita, roughly 0 to 4 years, voluntary) and the actual kindergarten stage (roughly 4 to 6 years, compulsory and part of state schooling). At cantonally recognised private schools such as Little Star Day School, the kindergarten stage too is a full, officially recognised alternative to the state kindergarten – including a binding alignment with the Lehrplan 21.
Anyone searching for an "English kindergarten" in Switzerland will encounter a broad spectrum of settings: from the purely English-speaking day school for international families to the carefully conceived bilingual nursery with a subsequent, cantonally recognised kindergarten stage, offering families a continuous bilingual early education with a binding link to the Lehrplan 21. In between, there are multilingual settings that market English as an add-on, and those that simply use the term as a marketing label.
The term "English kindergarten" is not a protected designation in Switzerland. Any setting may call itself one – regardless of how present English actually is in daily life, whether a structured language programme exists, and whether children can transition smoothly into state primary school afterwards. This means that parents who wish to make informed decisions need to ask the right questions – and know which type of setting they are actually looking for.
This article provides both. It first clarifies what the term really means in practice. It then presents the seven questions you should resolve before enrolling your child – concisely, without detours, with concrete criteria for your visit.
Before you can ask the right questions, you need a clear picture. Because the differences between the three variants are not cosmetic – they concern the pedagogical foundations, the language of daily life, school readiness, and ultimately your child's transition into primary school.
Variant |
Concept |
Suited to |
|---|---|---|
A – Purely English-speaking |
The language of instruction and care is exclusively English. No structured German. Typically follows a British or American curriculum (e.g. EYFS, US Common Core). Often affiliated with international schools. |
Primarily expat families without a Swiss state school pathway in mind. |
B – Bilingual DE/EN |
German and English given equal weight in daily life. Consistent immersion principle: one person, one language. Combines the Swiss Lehrplan 21 with an international curriculum (e.g. IPC or a setting's own Early Years Curriculum such as Little Star's). |
Swiss and international families who wish to keep both school pathways open. ★ Most common model in Switzerland. |
C – Multilingual (3+ languages) |
Three or more languages in daily life – e.g. German, English and French. A rarer, more demanding model requiring a specific pedagogical framework. |
Families with a multilingual background or a particular focus on multilingualism. |
There is also a fourth reality that does not count as a variant in its own right, yet is frequently encountered in practice and appears under the same label: English as a supplement to German-speaking childcare. This refers to settings in which English features once a week during a singing circle, in the form of English picture books, or through a weekly visit from a native speaker. This is valuable early years enrichment – but it is not a bilingual concept, and it should not be marketed as one.
Important to know
The terms "English kindergarten", "bilingual kindergarten" and "international kindergarten" are often used interchangeably in Switzerland – but they are not the same. Ask every setting directly: "Which languages do your staff speak in daily practice – and in what proportion?" and: "Is there a written language policy I can review?" The answers to these two questions will tell you which of the three variants you are actually dealing with.
This is the question that determines all the others – and it depends less on your own language skills than on a single follow-up question: where will your child go to school after kindergarten?
If Swiss state primary school is a realistic or even possible option, then the bilingual variant with a demonstrated link to the Lehrplan 21 is the only sensible choice. A purely English-speaking kindergarten operating exclusively under a British or American curriculum prepares children for an educational pathway that has no direct equivalent in the Swiss state school system. This does not mean that the transition would be impossible – but it requires adjustments that can place considerable strain on the child and the family. Grammatical concepts acquired in English will need to be re-established in German. Mathematical foundations introduced under a different system will require bridging. None of this is insurmountable – but it is unnecessary when a bilingual setting with a Lehrplan 21 link keeps both school pathways open from the outset.
If, on the other hand, an international school is planned or the family is internationally mobile, the purely English-speaking variant may be the more appropriate choice – it offers greater linguistic depth and clear preparation for internationally oriented school programmes such as the IB or A-Levels.
Table 2: Variant recommendations by family situation and intended school pathway.
Your situation |
Recommended variant |
Why |
|---|---|---|
Swiss family; state primary school planned or under consideration |
Bilingual DE/EN |
Lehrplan 21 alignment secures the transition; German remains structurally strong; both school pathways stay open |
International family; international school planned |
Purely English or bilingual |
Depends on the choice of school; German not strictly necessary, but valuable for everyday life and integration |
Expat family; length of stay uncertain |
Bilingual DE/EN |
Maximum flexibility; keeps all school pathways open; German useful for everyday integration |
Family with a multilingual background (e.g. German plus another language) |
Bilingual or multilingual |
Complements existing family languages; a clear language separation policy is especially important |
Family with an English-speaking parent |
Bilingual DE/EN |
Reinforces English as the family language whilst building German in parallel as the language of formal education |
Practical tip
If you are unsure which school pathway is right for your child, choose the bilingual option. It is the only one that closes no doors. A child who has grown up bilingually can move seamlessly into state primary school, a bilingual independent school, or an international school. The reverse route – from purely English back to state school – is considerably more demanding.
Once you know which variant you are looking for, the next – and often more decisive – question arises: how is the language concept actually put into practice at this particular setting? Because even within the bilingual variant, there are considerable differences in quality. The term "bilingual" says nothing in itself about how consistently, how thoughtfully, or how rigorously the concept is implemented.
The immersion principle is widely regarded in language acquisition research as the most effective method for early childhood bilingualism. The underlying principle is straightforward: each member of staff speaks exclusively in their mother tongue – to all children, in all situations, regardless of how the child responds or which language they use when addressing that member of staff. An English-speaking member of staff remains in English even when a child replies in German, is crying, or has their mother standing right beside them. A German-speaking member of staff always responds to English in German.
Why does this work? The brains of young children are wired to organise languages by people – not by rules. When a child understands that "I speak English with Ms Smith and German with Mr Müller", they develop two parallel language systems. Not one system with translations in between, but two independent systems between which they switch intuitively and effortlessly. This mechanism – known as code-switching – is not a sign of confusion but a sign of competence. It is the goal, not the problem.
The "One Person – One Language" immersion principle is also an integral part of everyday practice at Little Star Day School in Zurich and Zug.
Research background
Neurobiological studies confirm that children who are consistently cared for according to the immersion principle develop native-level competence in both languages – provided that language exposure is sufficient, consistent, and emotionally meaningful. What matters is not simply the number of hours, but the authenticity of language situations: English used during real conflicts, during nappy changes, during craft activities – not only during read-alouds or singing. Occasional code-switching during the developmental phase is normal and resolves itself as language confidence grows (Bialystok, 2011; Meisel, 2018; Paradis et al., 2021).
Some settings alternate the language by day of the week or by activity: Monday in English, Tuesday in German – or morning circle always in English, mealtimes always in German. This is an honest, pragmatic solution that can be communicated transparently. Neurobiologically, however, it is inferior to the immersion principle, because language becomes a contextual variable – the child learns to associate language with situations rather than with people. This tends to result in a weaker emotional bond with the second language and slower automatisation.
When a setting uses English primarily in structured add-on activities – singing circles, story sessions, weekly native speaker visits – this does not constitute a bilingual concept. It is a worthwhile complement to predominantly German-speaking childcare. The problem arises when settings market this model as an "English kindergarten" or "bilingual nursery". Parents hoping for genuine bilingualism in their child will be disappointed – not because the provision is poor, but because it is something other than what was promised.
Genuine bilingual quality is reflected not only in the consistency of the immersion principle, but also in structured language support within both languages. For English, the Jolly Phonics programme is regarded as one of the most effective approaches to early literacy: children learn sounds and letter combinations through play and hands-on activity – a foundation that substantially eases the transition into reading and writing at school. For German, the KonLab programme offers a scientifically grounded approach to developing grammatical competence and sentence structure – particularly valuable for children acquiring German as a second language.
Settings such as Little Star Day School that deploy such programmes – or comparable ones – in a targeted and age-appropriate manner demonstrate that bilingualism here is not left to chance. It is actively supported, accompanied, and documented.
Question for your visit
"What happens if a child consistently addresses your English-speaking member of staff in German – over a period of weeks?" A good setting will describe a pedagogical process: friendly consistency, no frustration, no exceptions, active support. This single question separates immersion as it is lived from immersion on paper.
One of the most common things parents say at an initial consultation is: "We've probably missed the right moment." In most cases, this is not true. But timing is not irrelevant – and the demands placed on the pedagogical concept shift considerably depending on the child's stage of development.
From a neurobiological perspective, the first six years of life represent the most productive window for language acquisition. During this phase, the brain is more plastic than at any later point: it forms phonological patterns – that is, the sound structure of a language – with an ease and precision that cannot be replicated in adulthood. Languages acquired during this window do not sound foreign later in life. They sound like a mother tongue.
This does not mean that starting at five is too late. It means that the setting's concept must be tailored to the child's starting point. A two-year-old who has not yet established a secure first language needs something fundamentally different from a five-year-old who can already narrate, reason, and ask questions in German.
Table 3: Starting age and requirements for the language concept. Sources: Bialystok (2011), Meisel (2018).
Age |
Language starting point |
What the concept must deliver |
|---|---|---|
Under 18 months |
No established first language |
Emotional security as the foundation; natural language immersion in both languages; no structured programme needed or appropriate |
18 months – 3 years |
First language in active development |
Consistent immersion principle; stable routines and rituals in both languages; playful language support without pressure |
3–5 years |
First language largely established, sentence structure in place |
Structured language programme in both languages (e.g. Jolly Phonics for English, KonLab for German); early literacy; targeted support for the second language |
5–6 years |
First language dominant, metalinguistic awareness emerging |
Intensive language immersion; individual pacing; targeted focus on school readiness in both languages; systematic development of pre-academic skills |
One hallmark of reputable settings is that they differentiate their provision by age group and can describe concretely what is done differently at each stage. Settings that apply the same concept to all children from birth to six years of age are disregarding fundamental differences in language development – and as a result are not delivering truly optimal support for any age group.
Warning sign
A setting that describes the same language programme for babies, toddlers, and five-year-olds should give you pause. Ask directly: "How does your language concept differ for a two-year-old compared to a five-year-old?" Anyone who cannot answer this question concretely has not truly thought the concept through.
This is the question at which many Swiss families hesitate – sometimes for so long that they decide not to try at all. Yet the hesitation is unfounded. A bilingual kindergarten is not reserved for English-speaking families. It is an early years setting designed for children of all linguistic backgrounds – and it achieves its effect precisely by making English tangible as a language of everyday life, without parents needing to speak it themselves.
The immersion principle works because children do not acquire language through explanations of meaning, but through contexts of action. A child who hears "Time to wash your hands" every day whilst being led to the sink does not need to translate that sentence. They understand it – not via German as a bridge, but directly, because the context carries the meaning. This principle applies to every word, every sentence, and every language situation that recurs with sufficient frequency and consistency.
For children who do not speak English at home, the initial settling-in period may take a little longer. In the first weeks or months, it is normal for a child to show no response to English utterances at all, or to respond only in German. This is not a failure of the concept – it is what is known as the silent period, a neurobiologically documented developmental phase in which children absorb language intensively without yet producing it actively. Parents who are familiar with this phase will find it far easier to navigate.
One frequently underestimated factor is the linguistic composition of the group of children. In a well-run bilingual setting, children bring a variety of mother tongues – German, English, and often additional family languages. This mix creates something no teaching programme can replicate: natural peer learning. When two children can only communicate with each other through English because it is the only language they share, English suddenly becomes real – not as a school subject, but as a social tool. That is precisely the goal.
You do not need to speak English at home. On the contrary: if you do not have a strong command of the language, it is better not to speak English with your child at all than to speak it uncertainly or inaccurately. As a rule of thumb: at home, each of you should speak your own first language – your language of the heart. This has three advantages. First, feelings can be expressed most directly in one's own first language. Second, your child learns that language, with all its subtleties and rules, directly from you. And third, the child can thereby keep the melodies of both languages cleanly apart right from the start. Children are remarkably sensitive to inconsistencies in language quality. What does always help is picking up the themes and experiences from kindergarten in your family language – listening, asking questions, and showing genuine interest. The emotional embedding of language learning – the sense that what happens at kindergarten also matters at home – is worth more than any vocabulary revision.
Question for your visit
"How do you support children through the silent period – and how do you communicate with parents during this time?" A good setting will describe this process proactively and reassuringly, explain the developmental phase, and provide regular feedback. Parents who are left without support during the silent period lose confidence – and often withdraw their child too soon.
This is one of the most important questions – and the one most frequently overlooked. Many parents only think to ask it when school entry becomes imminent and they realise they have no clear answer. By that point, it is too late for a well-informed decision.
The Lehrplan 21 is the shared reference framework for compulsory state schooling across the 21 German-speaking cantons of Switzerland. It defines competency goals across all relevant subjects and areas of development – from language and mathematics to nature and technology, as well as social and emotional learning. One important point here: the Lehrplan 21 is binding for the kindergarten stage itself (roughly 4 to 6 years) – including for cantonally recognised private schools such as Little Star Day School, which run this stage as a full alternative to the state kindergarten. For the period before that – crèche and nursery, roughly 0 to 4 years – the Lehrplan 21 does not apply; here, settings work with their own developmental frameworks, at Little Star for instance the Early Years Curriculum EYC® and, for the very youngest, the Nappy Curriculum. Accordingly, what matters most for the later move into Year 1 is how consistently the kindergarten stage itself implements the Lehrplan 21. For kindergarten, specific prerequisite competencies apply: phonological awareness, early mathematical concepts, graphomotor skills, self-regulation, and social behaviour.
A bilingual setting that is unfamiliar with these requirements, or disregards them, risks making the school transition harder for its children – not because the child would be linguistically overwhelmed, but because core competency goals will not have been developed systematically. This risk is real, and it is avoidable.
Table 4: Curriculum frameworks and their significance for the school transition in Switzerland.
Curriculum / Framework |
Focus |
Relevance for Swiss state school transition |
Compatible with Lehrplan 21? |
|---|---|---|---|
Lehrplan 21 (CH) |
Swiss state school competency goals |
Direct basis for transition; mandatory reference framework |
— (is the framework itself) |
International Primary Curriculum (IPC) |
Theme-based, international learning |
Very good; covers many Lehrplan 21 areas whilst adding an international perspective |
Yes, very well |
Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS, UK) |
British early years standards (0–5 years) |
Limited; no direct Swiss reference; transition requires supplementary provision |
Partially |
Proprietary curriculum (e.g. EYC®) |
Institution-specific |
High, if Lehrplan 21-compliant and academically documented |
Yes, if explicitly aligned with Lehrplan 21 |
US Common Core / Head Start |
American early years standards |
Low; significant divergence from the Swiss system |
Barely |
The strongest bilingual concepts combine the Lehrplan 21 with an international curriculum – thereby preparing children for both school pathways simultaneously: the state primary school and the international school. This is not a contradiction. It is the goal of a well-conceived bilingual concept. Children who have grown up in this way have more options – not fewer.
Specific questions for your visit
A setting that answers these questions with confidence and specificity has engaged seriously with the Swiss education system. Hesitation, evasiveness, or blanket reassurances are a warning sign.
Settling-in is an emotionally charged topic in any nursery. It is the moment when parents let go of their child for the first time – and when the child decides whether this place is safe. In a bilingual setting, an additional dimension arises that is rarely addressed in standard guides to settling-in: the child enters an environment in which a significant portion of communication takes place in a language they do not understand.
This is not cause for alarm – but it is reason to look more carefully. Because the question is not whether a child can cope with this situation. Children can – remarkably well and quickly. The question is whether the setting actively supports them through it, or leaves the child to navigate the linguistic disorientation alone.
The core principles of good settling-in apply here too: a gradual extension of care hours, a parent present during the first few days, a consistent key person, and regular feedback to the family. In a bilingual context, additional requirements come into play:
An English-speaking member of staff who switches to German during settling-in when a child is distressed means well. But in doing so, they undermine the very foundation of the concept – because the child learns in that moment: when things get difficult, the language disappears. This is the opposite of reliability.
A well-trained team will have developed strategies for remaining in their respective language even in emotionally challenging moments – through physical closeness, facial expression, gesture, melody, and touch. This requires experience, training, and an approach that takes the child seriously. Ask directly during your visit: "How does your English-speaking member of staff respond when a child is very upset during settling-in and does not yet understand a single word of English?" The answer reveals how deeply the concept is embedded in daily practice.
Warning sign
If a setting expects a child to attend full hours from the first or second day – before a genuine bond with their key person has formed – it is prioritising occupancy over the quality of attachment. Good settling-in takes time. Reputable settings plan for this time and communicate it transparently – as part of the pedagogical concept, not as an optional extra.
Since "English kindergarten" is not a protected term, parents are left with a single reliable method: look for yourselves, ask specific questions, and assess the answers critically. This is not an unreasonable demand – it is an investment of one to two hours that pays dividends for years.
Quality in a bilingual setting is not found in a glossy brochure, an Instagram account, or the number of Google reviews. It shows itself in how the team responds to uncomfortable questions, how children look when they are collected, and whether what is promised is visibly lived out in daily practice.
Warning signs
If you are only permitted to ask one question during your visit, make it this one: "What happens with a child who, after three months, still does not understand any English, cannot find their footing linguistically, and cries every day?"
A good answer describes a concrete, multi-stage process: close observation, a conversation with the parents, individual adjustment of language support, targeted assistance from the key person, and where necessary, consultation with a language development specialist. A poor answer offers blanket reassurances that this never happens. Because it does happen – and how a setting responds to it is the most honest indicator of quality you will find.
"English kindergarten" is not a protected term in Switzerland. It encompasses three distinct concepts: purely English-speaking settings (primarily for international families without a Swiss state school pathway in mind), bilingual German-English settings based on the immersion principle (the most common form and the most relevant for Swiss families), and multilingual provision with three or more languages. There are also settings that offer English merely as a supplementary activity without pursuing a genuine bilingual concept. Before enrolling, it is essential to ask directly: which language do your staff speak in daily practice – and how consistently?
No – this is one of the most common misconceptions. Some settings that call themselves "English kindergartens" operate exclusively in English, with no structured German and no Lehrplan 21 alignment. Others are genuinely bilingual according to the immersion principle. And in some settings, English appears primarily in songs, games, or weekly native speaker visits – which is valuable, but does not constitute a bilingual concept. The variant cannot be identified from the name of the setting; it can only be established through targeted questions during a visit.
Yes – provided the bilingual setting has a demonstrated alignment with the Lehrplan 21. Settings that integrate the Swiss curriculum framework into their concept prepare children systematically for the prerequisite competencies expected at school entry: phonological awareness, early mathematical concepts, self-regulation, and social behaviour. Purely English-speaking settings without a Lehrplan 21 connection can make this transition more difficult. Ask specifically during your visit about the setting's track record with school transitions.
No. The immersion principle is designed so that children acquire English through everyday experiences in the setting – not through translation or preparation at home. If your command of English is not strong, it is in fact better not to use the language at home. Speak the language you know well – your child needs linguistic depth and emotional security, not practice sessions. What does help is engaging with your child's experiences from kindergarten in your family language and showing genuine interest.
No – decades of research are unambiguous on this point. Children who grow up consistently according to the immersion principle develop two parallel language systems without being overwhelmed. Occasional code-switching – mixing both languages – is an entirely normal transitional phase and not a sign of confusion or linguistic weakness. It resolves itself once the child has internalised the association between language and person. Studies also show that bilingual children demonstrate advantages in executive functions such as attention control and cognitive flexibility (Bialystok, 2011).
The earlier, the more favourable the neurobiological conditions – particularly for phonological competence and acquiring grammar without an accent. Many bilingual settings in Switzerland accept children from infancy. Starting at three to five years of age is also effective, but places different demands on the concept: it must offer structured language support that builds on the first language already established. There is no point at which bilingualism becomes pointless – but the earlier the start, the more natural the acquisition.
A bilingual "kindergarten" in the sense of this article usually comprises two stages: a voluntary nursery stage (Kita, roughly 0 to 4 years) and a kindergarten stage that follows on from it (roughly 4 to 6 years). At cantonally recognised private schools such as Little Star Day School, this kindergarten stage fully replaces the state kindergarten and follows the Lehrplan 21 as a binding framework. International schools, by contrast, often provide their own pre-kindergarten programme from as early as age three and then carry education through without interruption to school-leaving level, following an international curriculum (such as the International Baccalaureate). A high-quality bilingual nursery with a recognised, Lehrplan 21-compliant kindergarten stage can be ideal preparation for both school pathways – state school and international school – and deliberately keeps the decision open until the move into Year 1.
"English kindergarten" sounds like a clear-cut category. It is not. Behind the term lies a spectrum of concepts ranging from genuine bilingual early education to English as a weekly singing circle – and everything in between goes by the same name.
This is not a criticism of individual settings. It is a description of an unregulated market in which parents bear the responsibility of making informed decisions. And informed decisions are only possible when you know what you are looking for – and which questions you need to ask in order to find it.
The answer to question one – which variant suits our family? – gives you direction. The answers to questions two through seven give you confidence. Together, they build a picture that is more reliable than any brochure, any online review, and any opening event with fresh flowers.
In the end, the simplest question remains the most important: do you feel at ease leaving your child there in the morning? And does your child feel at ease when they arrive? If both are true – and if all seven questions have found convincing answers – then you have found the right place.
Seit 2001 begleiten wir Familien in Zürich und Zug. Unsere Familienberaterin nimmt sich gerne Zeit für ein persönliches Gespräch, um all Ihre Fragen zu beantworten und Ihnen unsere Räumlichkeiten zu zeigen.
✓ Zweisprachig (DE/EN)
✓ Familiengeführt seit 2001
✓ Standorte in Kilchberg, Sihlcity & Zug
Die Little Star Day School begrüsst neue Eltern im Jubiläumsjahr mit attraktiven Willkommensgeschenken.
%20(Benutzerdefiniert).jpg)
Andere Blog-Artikel